Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts

The Urban Muslim Woman Show 13 - The networking event for independent female professionals, entrepreneurs, designers & students.

Exclusive from AsiansUK.com - The UK Asian Social Hub!


The only show this summer celebrating the essence of womanhood

The Urban Muslim Woman Show 13

INSPIRE   |   CONNECT   |   EMPOWER

Saturday 15th June 2013 | Novotel London West

4.30 pm onwards

The Urban Muslim Woman Show is a pioneering event that is aimed solely at promoting strong and independent female professionals, entrepreneurs, designers and students within the Muslim community. It is a celebration of the many achievements and successes of Muslim women and aims to inspire future generations with messages of empowerment and support.
 
Highlights for this year’s event: 
Panel of inspirational speakers
Islamic fashion show
Entertainment
Stand up live comedy
Exhibitors and product launch

Gala Dinner
New talent
Fundraising
Networking
 

We anticipate this distinct event will be bigger and better than ever. We ask all women to join this vital gathering and support our efforts to encourage and inspire our female members in the community.
 
The Urban Muslim Woman Show 12
 
 
For further details:
 
Facebook Fan Page: The-Urban-Muslim-Woman
Facebook Event Page: Facebook Events
                                 Twitter: @umwshow                              
 

 Delighted to announce AsiansUK are Official Media Partners of this prestigious event!


Join the AsiansUK Network

 

 


The Text and "App"lication Parenting Dilemma


Do you hear the chitter-chatter of little voices.  "May I call a friend to come to play?"  "May I use the phone?  I need to ask about a homework assignment."  "Let me call Grandma to tell her about my report card!"

Do your children have cell phones? If they do and they're modern kids, they text more than talk.  The banter above happens very rarely in today's homes.  A mother of one of my daughter's classmates exclaimed in frustration over her 14-year olds inability to figure out how to leave a phone message on an answering machine ... she felt ill-equipped and too embarrassed to do so.  The mother wrote her a script to get her through the fearsome event!

The child is an honor student,  reading at college level.  But she's missing a link in communication.


Children (including teens here) text more than we realize, both in number of messages and in content.  Used in secret, used independently, used without our knowledge, cell phones in "silent mode" vibrate in pockets all over the globe and allow kids to connect when the adults around them go about their business, ignorant of the activity.  Kids have codes to alert each other that an adult is in the room, they use ring tones at higher pitches on low volume so that older people can't hear the alerts pinging.

  






No more paper folded into tiny, tight football shapes for clever, discreet passing across desktops or in the hallways at school.  Kids pass notes via the ether, send photographs without consideration for content, or for the fact that the pictures and words can travel endlessly, cell phone to cell phone and even onto the Internet for wider distribution.  Forever.  Many adults have trouble with this concept, too.

Kids have unlimited talk and text because adults can't seem to keep the usage down to a minimum and don't want to pay by the minute or by the text.  Providers know how to draw in the customers with bundling and family plans.  "Family" is an operative, psychologically sensitive word in the marketplace and it works.  Many children don't have limits on the time they spend either online via Smart Phone or in the number of texts they send, or when and where they may use their technological devices.  They communicate at all hours, in all venues, and even when societal rules tell them they shouldn't (church, classroom, at the dinner table, in the middle of a social event). 

Kids -- and people in general -- wouldn't pick up a phone to verbally share the information they're texting.  They wouldn't pick up a book to find out the information they "Google" or Bing".  How many of us would interrupt in the middle of a social gathering to say, "Excuse me.  I'm going to use the house phone for a minute."  Would anyone really interrupt a dinner conversation to say, "Let me look that one up in the encyclopedia ..."   Would you?  No.  But many of us text it and surf for it.  Seems less invasive, huh? 

How does this differ from your early years of learning about communication?  Talking on the phone meant you were tethered to a wall with a cord that stretched only so far, possibly in a central location in the home, and within earshot of family. You had rules, time limits, calling zones to consider, thought to others wanting to use the phone, and thought to the importance of making the call at all.  Many families didn't take calls after certain hours, and never during dinner time.  We did not have answering machines, and we learned a sensible use of time and importance in making any calls at all.

The phone habits of our children don't provide these parameters, or at the least, very many that resemble them.

Today's children have grown up in an era of secrecy and self-direction against the grain of familial preference.   Parents feel their hands are tied by invisible cord -- with a known inability to corral their kids in their communication pursuits. Cell phones allow for hidden conversation, deceit, learned habits from unknown sources, and changes in attitudes that we would never support as parents. How much do you know about your child's cell phone habits?  Records.  Sure.  You can check them, but how do you manage the behavior that builds those records?  Do you know who they have on their Contact Lists, whom they contact most often, what types of information they send and receive?  You may have an angelic child who uses her phone only when necessary?  I do.  Yet the information that comes to her via the device is out of my control and most likely, without my knowledge. 

Do we, as parents, truly understand the freedom we give our children just by providing them a cell phone?  When we provide Internet access, we provide them the world.  In view of faith, what amount of good does providing our children with the world  ... without limits ... do for them?  The family computer resides in plain sight, but the cell phone lives on their hips, ushering in parts of life we may not know or expect.

"And what do you benefit if you gain the whole world but lose your own soul?"
Mark 8:36 

From before their birth we protected them by eating right, getting medical care, staying fit, preparing all the needs for their arrival to nurture them without room for error.  We boiled their pacifiers when they fell to the floor. We made sure the formula or baby food was the proper temperature. We provided healthy foods and we limited their television viewing from toddlerhood onward, and what they did see helped them learn, not just entertain.  We read to them, encouraged their creativity in art and song.  We enrolled them in classes for enjoyment and to grow their natural talents, checked their homework, and packed healthy lunches.

And then we bought them cell phones and found out what "lack of control" and "independence" really means.

Some parents, and my husband and I belong to this group, held off on the cell phone purchase for much longer than most.  Our daughter received her phone 2 months ago, and probably really was the last kid in her class to get one (she claims this is true).  The longer we held out and observed her peers and the general population -- and ourselves -- the more we wanted to avoid the reality that this phone would introduce:  more independence and participation in the outside world than we would allow in a physical, observable, tactile existence.  We are not overprotective parents, but we do believe that children need boundaries and strong guidance, rather than direction in navigating GPS. 

Do we want our children to Stumble Upon it when we have avoided skinned knees and trips on the curbs all their lives?  Do we feel that  taking a chance in Tumblr fits our moral compass?  Do they really need to Pin It?  Must they Find it on Facebook?  Does it really enhance their experience to compete in Four Square online rather than a face-to-face game of the real thing on the playground?

Does the good outweigh the bad?  When did we lose the spirit and the need to teach morals and ethics to our children, not only in word but in deed?  When did we leave so much to them, a world full of unchecked information, when in a few years we will want to carefully guide their practice sessions in an automobile and make sure they have excellent control before allowing them to drive alone?

Cell phones are not bad.  The Internet has tremendous usefulness to us.  They are tools that have amazingly good uses.  What self-control, limits and lines to we put on that usefulness, and how do we teach it and model it?  How do we direct it for our children's benefit?  How do we go about protecting them and guiding them and providing the best examples and experiences for them to take into their futures with these devices available for their use ... at their discretion?

They can't look up when they're so drawn to looking down, into the screens of their phones.  Can they feel the Holy Spirit's guidance more strongly than the vibration of the phone in the pocket? 

What do you think?

Sharing with:

TLHV button



Wise-Woman-Builds


Facebook Makes Me Mad Sometimes


Well, its been nearly 2 years since my Facebook rants ... and plenty of changes have passed then ...  I think the users have more than tripled or more ... and my FB friends have surged to just over 100, still manageable ... but the inherent silliness still prevails.


I can appreciate the wonders of Facebooking, to keep in touch and to share, in a manner that is more intimate and profound than say just by emails.The Facebook universe is now 175 million users strong.

After sitting at a computer typing all day, the last thing I want to do when I get home is sit in front of another computer so that I can read the fascinating facts and fancies on "25 Random Things About Me" from 3 of my friends.

I also don't feel the need to constantly update an entire network of friends about the daily minutiae of my life. My life is to be lived, not to be updated. And the mf box "What's on your mind" ... I mean if I tell you what is really on mind mind, I would have no friends left??!! I mean, how to say "I have been thinking of screwing with the cleaning lady ten minutes ago"??!!

The silly mf strategy games they play ... so you have grown the world's largest cabbage, go and eat it yourself.... so you are looking for carrots and manure, fuck me silly if I am bothered to even care. My eyes have glazed over hundreds of time whenever I open my Facebook. Soon, I will be doing a Linda Blair, my eyeballs will make a 360 degrees revolution from too much eyes rolling.

Then, there are the friends who will update you at least 5 times a day, as if sooo many people are so interested in the most mundane aspects of your lives. I mean, I seriously get postings such as: "... sigh, just wondering about nothing ..." I mean, seriously, go fuck yourself silly, even your own mum would be cursing under her breath. Stop the narcissist in you, no more "look at me, look at me...".

Don't just simply whack without offering solutions, I always say. Well, I hope Facebook will make all users to flag all their comments to 5 categories: if you are making a senseless comment that only your wildest fan or stalker will enjoy hearing, flag that as "1"; if its about something that is mildly important, then click "2"; if its and opinion that some may enjoy, then click "3"; if its a major development in your personal life or career, click "4"; if its absolutely must be viewed by all your friends, then click "5". Your friends , like me, who have a low tolerance of everything and anything, will possibly allow comments and updates that are "4" or "5" to filter to my account.


If by chance you have a nonsensical update and you put that as a "4", I guarantee you I will go and write a load of b.s. on your fucking wall for not being able to decipher what is "value add commentary / opinion" and what is crap.

For now, I cannot go and tell all my friends that they are idiots for writing what they wrote cause its so prevalent. Till today, after nearly one year, I still have less than 40 friends (now just over 100), and proud of it.

I won't be wasting time 'poking' cyber friends. Pick up the phone/mobile and call to ask them out for lunch or dinner, poke here poke there for fucks!!??

People make friends like they are collecting sand, ... "today I made another 4 friends", ... well, fuck me, I did not make four new friends the whole of last month in real life. It waters down the concept of who is a friend, and what a friend is to you. That definition is getting shallower by the day with the advent of the internet.

I guess my plea to my friends is to try and make Facebook work for us, to bring us closer together, not to agitate and piss the shit out of others, and waste our time and resources over inane stuff. Use Facebook as a tool, if you let Facebook take over your life, then you are the tool. Enjoy and maintain relations with family, friends and relatives ... in person as much as you can.



p/s photos: Lisa Surihani

Facebook Buys Malaysia's Octazen Solutions

(Excerpts culled from AllFacebook.com , techcrunch.com , gigaom.com )

Facebook has bought up under-the-radar Octazen Solutions in what the company says is a “small talent acquisition.”

Facebook spokesperson Larry Yu described the buy as a “talent acquisition,” saying Octazen’s two employees have joined Facebook as engineers. As he put it in a company statement on the acquisition he sent via email:
“We’ve admired the engineering team’s efforts for some time now and this is part of our ongoing effort to add experienced, accomplished technical talent to help drive the company forward in its efforts to be the central way for people to connect and share information.”

Elanne Kwong (20090221-141445)

Octazen’s software helps sites like Facebook grow by making it easy for users to invite their contacts on other services. When Octazen receives an email address and password it fetches a list of contacts and puts them in an array for customers to use and store (and hopefully not abuse!). Octazen has taken down most of its site in light of the acquisition, but archived versions show it charged for software licenses between $39 and $200 per domain server plus a yearly update fee.

Octazen describes itself on its website as a “webmail contacts importer” and Facebook was already using the firm to “grow its number of users by encouraging them to invite their email contacts.”

This is Facebook’s first acquisition since it purchased social sharing service FriendFeed over the summer in a deal that was also described as mainly being driven by a desire to add talent.

However, unlike FriendFeed—which continues to operate separately seven months later—Facebook has already moved to shut Octazen down; an on the Octazen website says the company is winding down operations and will no longer accept new customers.

http://www.octazen.com/

What exactly has Octazen been up to? The company is mostly about above-board contact importing from one service to another – signing in to Gmail from Facebook, for example, to import your contacts there and add them as Facebook friends. Much of this is done via OAuth and APIs, but Octazen is known to dive much deeper for data.

One example – Octazen will sometimes collect and store user credentials directly, and sign into large social networks and other sites as if they were the user, say multiple sources. Then they’ll download the address book and social graph. A percentage of your friends on that service might be users of the service (now Facebook) paying Octazen, and you’ll be asked to friend them. But there’s a big question about what happens to the rest of the data as well, and if Octazen is storing a shadow social network in violation of terms of service to recommend user connections down the road. And they may look deeper at data than they should – at email header information, for example, to get a better understanding of who you communicate with the most.

But the most unnerving part of Octazen, say our sources, is the fact that they are very, very good at scraping data at scale without being detected. They may hit a service using lots of different IP addresses, for example, and remain undetected. Octazen could, they say, scrape very public sites like Twitter, where the social graph is on each profile, in a way that Twitter wouldn’t know it’s happening.

Facebook already uses Octazen to mysteriously determine your long lost friends and suggest that you re-connect with them (leading to scores of emails into our inbox that Facebook is somehow reading emails or otherwise getting data they shouldn’t be).

The big question is why Facebook would need to acquire a company located half way around the world if all they were doing is standard address book imports via OAuth and APIs, or proprietary but well documented protocols like Facebook uses. The implication is that these guys have serious expertise in data gathering at scale that may sometimes be in violation of the terms of service of the sites being harvested.

This is obviously just one side of the possible story, albeit based on hard evidence of Octazen’s shady prior practices and via multiple sources. But until Facebook explains this acquisition in more detail, we don’t have much more to go on.




Here are three reasons All Facebook wrote as possible reasons for acquiring Octazen:

Simple Talent Acquisition

Facebook needed a team which could constantly monitor changes to third-party email providers to ensure that they retain the ongoing viral growth. Octazen, a company Facebook has already been working with, provided this ability and will help ensure that Facebook’s contact importer will function through part of the company’s most critical growth phase: the race to 1 billion users.

While the company didn’t need to acquire the company, locking in the developers behind Octazen for at least a few years will ensure that Facebook has the developers’ full-time attention (despite not having oversight of the developers who are based in Malaysia and will remain there).

Protect Their Viral Growth

There is a small chance that Octazen currently has information which is extremely proprietary which helps ensure Facebook’s contact importer continues to function. In order to protect that knowledge, Facebook locked in the developers and bound them into an agreement in which their technology could not be used for any other organizations. That would explain the following statement on the Octazen Solutions website:

The Octazen team wanted to let you, our valued customers, know that the company recently received an offer to acquire most of the company’s assets and to employ those assets in a different direction. After carefully evaluating this offer, our team believes this is a wonderful opportunity of which we must take advantage.

As a result, effective immediately, Octazen will no longer accept new service contracts or renew existing service contracts, and will enter a transition period to wind down operations.

A Simple Present Value Calculation

Facebook may have been paying significant fees to the Octazen solutions company. Given that they knew they would be paying those fees for at least the next 3 to 5 years, Facebook decided to do a simple financial calculation and figure out the present value of the future outgoing cash flows to maintain the contact importer. Add a little on top of the present value and you’d get Facebook’s acquisition price which just made financial sense.

(I guess all Malaysians would like to know what price they paid the two guys. Its obviously a talent acquisition plus they probably have something they are doing which may be better exploited and protected at a place like Facebook. It would not be a big sum for sure or else, they couldn't tie the two down to work at Facebook. I am thinking in the region of US$10m, with contractual periods to work hand in hand with Facebook team of engineers).

p/s photo: Elanne Kong

MOL Buys Friendster




Wow! What a deal ... but maybe 5 years too late??!! At a time where everybody is Facebooking or migrating to Facebook, it is hard to see real long term values in having Friendster.

WSJ: Vincent Tan reached a deal to acquire Friendster Inc., a social-networking site that retains a big following in South Asia but has been eclipsed globally by rivals such as Facebook Inc. and MySpace. Tan is buying 100% of Friendster, which is based in Mountain View, Calif., through his online-payments business, MOL Global Pte. Ltd., which is based in Malaysia.

Financial terms of the deal weren't disclosed. MOL is buying Friendster from a group of investors including venture capital firms Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, Benchmark Capital, DAG Ventures and IDG Ventures.

Friendster, whose site launched in 2003, blazed a trail for social networking—the idea of connecting with other Internet users via Web profiles. But as the company struggled with performance issues, many users ditched it in favor of newer alternatives.

Friendster said more than 75 million of its 115 million registered users are in Asia and more than 90% of its daily traffic comes from the region. It is especially popular in Malaysia, the Philippines and Indonesia. But over the past year sites such as Facebook and MySpace have surpassed Friendster in the Asian-Pacific region, according to data from research firm comScore. MySpace is owned by News Corp., which also owns The Wall Street Journal.

"The new combined entity gives Friendster the kind of financial backing, retail distribution, and e-commerce infrastructure that will enable us to accelerate our strategy and create a locally relevant, fun experience for our users in Asia, both on and offline," said Friendster Chief Executive Richard Kimber in a prepared statement.

MOL's principal shareholder is Mr. Tan, who is chairman and chief executive of Berjaya Corp., a diversified Malaysian conglomerate. Attempts to reach a representative for Berjaya were unsuccessful.

A former insurance-company employee, Mr. Tan has built his business empire since the 1980s, when he won the right to operate the McDonald's franchise in Malaysia. He became close to then-Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad and branched out into gambling, tourism, property and telecommunications.

Today, Berjaya has annual revenue of $1.8 billion and its interests include Starbucks and 7-Eleven franchises, a local English-language newspaper and major property developments.

MOL, which handles 60 million payment transactions a year, plans to merge its operations with Friendster to create an Asia-wide content, distribution and commerce network. MOL provides systems to collect payments for content and services, such as online games and music, movies and video.

"We are creating a unique company that will be well positioned to provide content to a huge, regional user base, here in Southeast Asia," said Ganesh Kumar Bangah, chief executive of MOL in a statement.

Mr. Bangah will become the group chief executive of the combined entity while Mr. Kimber will become the nonexecutive chairman.

Nor Badron, a spokesman at Friendster, said the company will continue to maintain its headquarters in the U.S. "There is currently no plan to move Friendster's headquarters to Malaysia. We will continue to operate at all our existing offices," he said.

Friendster currently has sales offices in Malaysia, the Philippines and Singapore.


p/s photos: Anjori Alagh