Showing posts with label ytl-e. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ytl-e. Show all posts

Start the KL-Singapore Bullet Train Project Already!


The KL-Singapore bullet train project was mooted as far back as 2006. Till today, nothing came of it. Mark Mobius of Templeton Emerging Markets was in KL recently and was asked what were the competitive advantages or sectors that Malaysia had an edge in. He said, and I agreed, plantations and tourism. We are doing well enough in plantations, even though it appears only IOI Corp is moving up the entire value chain and integrating the processes vertically and horizontally - what are the other plantation companies doing? Many are still happy to be planting and harvesting then selling, there are plenty of value add processes to palm oil in order to transform them into various other uses. While we have our R&D in plantation, we still need to pump it up with a more open collaborative research institute to get at fresher ideas of how to further enhance the usage of palm oil. Why don't we give out 5 sponsored Phds for foreign students that do higher research in palm oil related studies every year, and give them 3 year stints after that at PORLA? Why don't we establish one or two chairs for renown research scientists in food/plant biology/ chemistry or related subjects within PORLA to further energise the unit. Don't just employ local research staffers, it stunts our way of thinking, you need a different perspective, a fresher way of looking at things all the time.

Now onto the second part, tourism, we have so much potential but its all over the place. We have tons of beaches, diving spots, natural rainforests, caves, etc... eco-tourism is the way forward. Only we have that kind of tourism, .... you can do your Disneyland or Universal Studio or casinos, those things can be transplanted anytime anywhere within a couple of years. We need a cohesive strategy to manage the operators, grade them continually, have a strong tourism police force to check and evaluate the operators, have a site that grades and allows access to all the licensed operators. Bad hats will be punished severely. The operators within a region will have to do their part with the help of Tourism Ministry to maintain the "essence, integrity and longevity" of the eco-toursim spots.

Now, for a tourist, they have to search in the dark, rely on recommendations from friends, to get to interesting places. Already we have such a strong platform, the best run and cheapest budget airline in Asia as a base.

The second idea, which is critical as well, is to build the Singapore-KL bullet train. It is best to extend the ERL line. Why sit on it for 3 years??? It is so viable and the multiplier effects will be fantastic. Malaysia has the cheapest 5 star hotels in Asia, period. Malaysia has the best food in Asia, period. Most of our neighbours love to come to visit, especially Singaporeans, but have you seen the weekend jams at the causeway? The difference in currency is also a strong power puller.

Imagine a trip from KL-Singapore taking 90 minutes, add 30 minutes for the wait and checking in and checking out. Two hours and you are in KL, can you imagine the crowd. Heck, you can be very profitable even by charging RM50-RM100 per one way trip, yes, you can rip the bus travel to shreds. If you add one stop at Melaka, well you know how many new hotels will be built around Melaka? It takes the stress out of driving.

The bullet train has multiplier effects on both cities because the project basically makes KL a suburb of Singapore, and Singapore a suburb of KL, you basically enlarged the urban population of both cities overnight. You will find on most days and probably weekends that 1/5 of the people having fun in that city will be from the other city. On special occasions, it will be even more pronounced.

On the business front, there are plenty of companies, especially foreign companies that will set up offices in KL instead of Singapore. With the bullet train, they could literally take the 7am train and start meeting clients in Singapore from 10am onwards, he/she could meet 4 clients and have lunch with one, do a bit of shopping and take the 6pm train back and still be home in KL by 9pm. All that for RM100??? Just the thought of relocating from Singapore to KL would save a company some two-thirds in costs immediately. There are plenty of these type of enhanced business contacts and privileges that comes with the bullet train project. Gawd! Its only RM8bn, it the oil subsidy bill for a few months!!! If you can afford the RM60bn stimulus bill, you can tag on another RM8bn that would have very strong long term multiplier benefits to many sectors of our economy. This is the exact kind of big projects that moves us UP THE VALUE CHAIN!!! This is exactly, what we need.

Don't worry about Singapore, they would be more than happy to participate. They are pragmatic enough, just that we are not. Such a project will need strong parties to pull this off as there are vested interests involved. I would suggest the following: YTL 40%; SIA 20%; MAS 20%; UEM 20%. Now why would I want UEM inside?

The bullet train project will be critical in jump starting the Nusajaya project as well. Right now, there are some people working in Singapore that travels daily to Singapore from Nusajaya. Can you imagine the flow on effects if there is a connecting line from Nusajaya???

Imagine this, there is an express train every hour from Kl-Singapore on the hour. Once every 3 hours, the train will stop at Melaka and Nusajaya, i.e. one in every 3 trains is not express. The Nusajaya line will be made up of a separate line on its own with 4 stations, each station will be attached to a huge parking area. These 4 stations will lead to Nusajaya. There will be a train running direct from Nusajaya to Singapore Raffles Place direct every 30 minutes during peak travel period, and reduces to 1 hour on non-peak.

Watch the properties in Nusajaya being snapped up, watch the plethora of Singapore companies jumping to invest in other sectors in Nusajaya.

Sigh... another National Service , another idea that will not get me my datukship... another idea for free... wait it gets better, the second phase of the project will go north bound, half an hour for Ipoh-KL (gee, many might even move back to Ipoh to work in KL), one hour for KL-Penang (Singaporeans will laugh, 2.5 hours from Singapore-Penang, food glorious food), and the piece `de resistance... KL-Hatyai in 3 hours, which makes Singapore-Hatyai in just 5.5 hours ... The collective urbanisation of these cities will recharge the business activity in each and every city, it will in effect double, even triple the "population effect" of each city.


-----------------------
2006

KUALA LUMPUR: Imagine zipping in a bullet train from the KL Sentral station into the heart of Singapore in 90 minutes flat. That is something that will become a reality if tycoon Tan Sri Francis Yeoh’s plan to build and operate such a train service at a cost of up to RM8 billion takes off.

Yeoh told the New Straits Times that the Malaysian and Singapore Governments had been informed of the proposal by YTL Corp for the fast train service.

If approved, the project will become the largest to be launched on a private finance initiative (PFI) basis, as encouraged under the Ninth Malaysia Plan.

Construction will take three years but it could be two years before cross-border approvals and land acquisition are obtained.

Yeoh said that if the project is approved, YTL would go to the global capital market to raise the needed funds to finance it. Partners providing the rail and train technology for the project could be either Japanese, French or German operators of fast train services.

"Every single fund manager loves this project and a lot of consumers want it. The industries want it. It’s a no-brainer. It’s the perfect alternative to air and land transport between the two hubs and will integrate them," he said.

"This is not a dream and a project that can’t be done. It can be done if there is a will to do it. And I pray that there will be this will to do it," he said.

"It will help move the economy ahead. The country now needs the boost of fresh private sector investment and we can do that with projects like this."

Yeoh said the KL-Singapore fast rail link could be an extension of the Sentral-Kuala Lumpur International Airport train service that is currently operated by YTL majority-owned Express Rail Link (ERL).

The ERL was built at a cheap cost of RM35 million per kilometre compared to other train projects in the developed world built at between RM120-RM150 million per kilometre. The ERL project received no government subsidies.

"We can extend the airport line to Singapore. We can also find ways for the rail link to pass through the newly developing southern Johor Corridor enroute to Singapore," he added.

Under the YTL proposal, a new standard gauge railway line would have to be built across the southern states to accommodate trains with wider wheels that can travel at a speed of up to 350km per hour.

The metre-gauge railway lines currently used by Keretapi Tanah Melayu (KTM) can only accommodate trains with a smaller wheel size and a maximum speed of 140 km per hour.

Yeoh said the timing was just right for the launch of the project now as the Malaysian Government was keen on it and the cost of land acquisition to build the rail connection was relatively cheap.

Land cost usually accounts for 70 per cent of the cost of such rail projects while the cost for the technology accounts for 30 per cent.

"It is the land value that is important. The land cost is still affordable now in Malaysia, unlike in Hong Kong, the US or Europe."

Yeoh said Singapore has also had a look at the project.

"I don’t think they will be that difficult. We have been chatting with them for quite a while now."

Yeoh said he was ready to accept Malaysia Airlines and Singapore Airlines as well as the airport operators of both cities as "cornerstone investors" in the project to ensure relevant entities from both sides had a stake in the project.

The direct rail link will provide commuters with an alternative to expensive air travel and the slower journey by car or bus.



p/s photos: Yukie Nakama



Mesdaq IPOs - Meltdown & Reasons


Used to be, investors would jump in with all they have whenever there was a subscription for new IPOs. Back in the early 90s till the financial implosion in 97, most IPOs were recording opening day gains of at least 30%, and usually a lot more than that. Even during the dreary post financial crisis days, one can still get decent gains on most IPOs. For the past 3 years, Mesdaq IPOs started shakily, but thanks to new listings such as Symphony House (now transferred to the Main Board) and the huge (but sedentary YTL-e), investors got more comfortable with Mesdaq stocks. As long as one can make money, people will come in droves. Sensing an opportunity, syndicates got involved quickly. The authorities basically practiced a hands-off approach as the rise in Mesdaq activity bodes well for future listings and viability of Mesdaq.

This is good for most concerned as entrepreneurs get to cash out (well, some or most of it, if they play it smart). VCs and angel investors got to really cash out big time, thus propelling interest for the VCs to fund more start-ups.

In The Edge Daily, it was reported that: "Most Mesdaq Market initial public offerings (IPOs) in 2005 were disappointing, with more than half or 26 of the 46 listings closing on Dec 30 below their offer prices. Analysts blame the disappointing performance of these Mesdaq counters on unexciting prospects, high valuations and poor market sentiment. ... On a brighter note, analysts say a handful of Mesdaq companies such as mTouche Technology Bhd and Green Packet Bhd appear to have gotten their strategies right and are moving in the right direction. ... ES Ceramics Technology Bhd was the worst performer. Its share price fell 66% to 18.5 sen as of Dec 30 from its offer price of 55 sen. Ygl Convergence Bhd is down 58% to 37.5 sen (IPO price 90 sen); ConnectCounty Holdings Bhd 60% to 13 sen (32 sen); MLabs Systems Bhd 49% to 28 sen (55 sen). EcoFuture Bhd is down 50% to 12.5 sen (25 sen) and Vitrox Corporation Bhd 28% to 43 sen (60 sen). ... However, analysts say there were several companies that bucked the trend, especially those with strong business models and growth strategy. mTouche’s share price surged 460% to RM3.36 (60 sen) while Green Packet’s jumped 270% to RM2.04 (55 sen). TMC Life Sciences Bhd is up 136% to 90 sen (38 sen) and KZen Solutions Bhd 92% to 63.5 sen (33 sen). "

The authorities have threathened to tighten listing requirements for Mesdaq companies. Since Nov 29 last year, companies now must provide a profit forecast while non-technology-based but high-growth firms must have an audited operating revenue for at least three years. My view is that the authorities should take a hands-off approach (as much as possible) as over-regulation will impede the natural forces critical for the well-being of a "good capital market". Tightening listing requirements is good as it was a too easy to list before - but we should be careful from here on as we don't want to make it so hard to list. Bearing in mind these are "growth stocks", the risks associated with them would be much higher and investors have to understand and live with it.

What the authorities should do, is to tighten where/when the owners/promoters get to sell their shares. As these are growth companies, one is listing to secure capital to fund their growth - it is not a cashing out exercise. That being the case, the owners/promoters must show as much committment to the company as the investors are willing to bear the high risk of buying their company shares. Even the current rules are too loose for owners/promoters. We first need to tighten rules that allow owners/promoters to sell their shares. We need to discourage them from a quick turnaround. I would recommend something like:
a) owners/promoters must collectively hold at least 50% of the company's outstanding shares for 4 years
b) after the first 4 years, the minimum ownership level will be lowered to 40% for another 4 years
c) owner/promoter cannot sell a single share until 12 months after its IPO, even then they can only sell no more than 5% of outstanding shares each year

That would solve part of the problem of dumping. The danger here is that if we enforce lock-ups of a large amount of shares, it will make it easier for syndicates to play havoc with them, without the need for approval/consent from owners/promoters. However, this is not the kind of problem faced by Mesdaq listings, but rather the grave under-performance of new IPOs. Let's face the facts, for every Mesdaq IPO, only a very small amount gets to the hands of the public. The bulk has been placed out to institutions, high net worth individuals or fund managers. The fact that most of them still went below their IPO price soon after tells us that even "astute financial minds" do not consider the growth prospects of most these companies to be up to scratch. If they do, they would be holding on to these shares.

So why do we have a problem with most new IPO listings. For one, it is the over-aggressiveness of merchant bankers to score new deals that the "viability" and "growth prospects" are being glossed over. I am a firm believer in free market forces, i.e. when a merchant banker brings an issue to the market, the risks transfers to the buyer of the shares. It is up to the buyer to assess the inherent risks and attractiveness of the counter. Too much hand-holding by the merchant banker,... well, you might as well ask the merchant bank to buy the shares themselves and sell it to you when the price goes up! However, we must have a stronger link and effect on merchant banks to their IPOs, so that investors know their reputation is on the line. We need the media to focus more on performances of the Mesdaq firms and the merchant banks that took them public. If there is more accountability, eventually the merchant bankers will tighten up on themselves on the listability of a firm, whether they can get long term institutional shareholders to hold the shares instead of "trading outfits", and whether they can sell the growth prospects/concepts for the stock - plus they will make more of an effort to educate and inform the public on the prospects and make-up of each company. Below are the bankers involved in the under-performers and out-performers cited in the article in The Edge Daily. You draw your own conclusions, but its pretty clear to me. Just go ahead and list the Mesdaq IPOs and their sponsors for the past 2 years and see how they have been performing.

Under-performers

YGL Convergence - K&N Kenanga
ES Ceramics - AmMerchant Bank
Connect County -AmMerchant Bank
MLabs Systems - Alliance Merchant Bank
EcoFuture - Affin Merchant Bank
Vitrox - Hwang DBS

Out-Performers

mTouche - Public Merchant Bank
KZen Solutions - Public Merchant Bank
Green Packet - OSK Merchant Bank
TMC Life Sciences - AmMerchant Bank